In what circumstances, if any, is it appropriate to imply a term into a lease that prohibits a tenant from using the demised premises for an illegal purpose? That was the issue in Assethold Ltd v Interface Properties Ltd [2024] UKUT 371 (LC).
Winners & losers

A year after the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Lawrence & Another v Fen Tigers Ltd & Others[2014] AC 822, [2014] UKSC 13 how have the radical changes foreshadowed by that case played out?
Click here to read more on the article.
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Tanfield or by Tanfield as a whole.