Jonathan Upton considers the principles that apply to the recovery of legal costs through a service charge following the recent cases of Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Geyfords Limited v O’Sullivan [2015] UKUT 683 (LC).
The full text can be read here.
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Tanfield or by Tanfield as a whole.
In what circumstances, if any, is it appropriate to imply a term into a lease that prohibits a tenant from using the demised premises for an illegal purpose? That was the issue in Assethold Ltd v Interface Properties Ltd [2024] UKUT 371 (LC).
We are delighted to announce that we have been shortlisted for 3
