Rakusen v Jepsen: Sam Madge-Wyld comments on the decision

The recent Supreme Court judgment in Rakusen v Jepsen has excited an understandable amount of interest. The issue was whether a Rent Repayment Order can only be made against an immediate landlord or whether a superior landlord can also be made liable.

Sam Madge-Wyld has contributed to the debate by way of LexisNexis’ commentary on the topic. You can see a copy of this here.