Tanfield is pleased to announce their third conference on the Building Safety
News
Rakusen v Jepsen: Sam Madge-Wyld comments on the decision
The recent Supreme Court judgment in Rakusen v Jepsen has excited an understandable amount of interest. The issue was whether a Rent Repayment Order can only be made against an immediate landlord or whether a superior landlord can also be made liable.
Sam Madge-Wyld has contributed to the debate by way of LexisNexis’ commentary on the topic. You can see a copy of this here.
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Tanfield or by Tanfield as a whole.
Related barristers
Articles
Annie Higgo discusses the types of claims and issues that may arise for property litigators when dealing with deceased parties in the context of possession proceedings.
