In what circumstances, if any, is it appropriate to imply a term into a lease that prohibits a tenant from using the demised premises for an illegal purpose? That was the issue in Assethold Ltd v Interface Properties Ltd [2024] UKUT 371 (LC).
Podcast on Cheung v Mackenzie looking at the law on restrictive covenants
Katie Gray talked to Ian Quayle of IQ Legal Training/Property Law UK about the recent decision in Cheung v Mackenzie [2023] EWHC 220 (Ch). You can listen to the podcast on Spotify here or Amazon here.
Subscribe
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Tanfield or by Tanfield as a whole.