In what circumstances, if any, is it appropriate to imply a term into a lease that prohibits a tenant from using the demised premises for an illegal purpose? That was the issue in Assethold Ltd v Interface Properties Ltd [2024] UKUT 371 (LC).
JS v RS – Clearing the Clutter of Contributions & Conduct and Settling for Less!

If a party in financial remedy proceedings makes an offer which is less advantageous than the financial order which the court would consider appropriate, is the court obliged to make the higher order, in line with it’s view of that party’s entitlement?
Sir Peter Singer answered this question whilst considering a short marriage (6 years including cohabitation) between a high-earning wife and a husband against whom she had made numerous non-contribution and conduct allegations.
Click here to read more of Gwyn Evans article via Linkedin.
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Tanfield or by Tanfield as a whole.