In BR v VT Mostyn J ordered the sale of a matrimonial home in which the wife and children were living, but on an interim basis – prior to the making of the final order. What can we learn from this, and how should we be advising our clients?
Click here to read more on this article by Gwyn Evans.
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Tanfield or by Tanfield as a whole.
In what circumstances, if any, is it appropriate to imply a term into a lease that prohibits a tenant from using the demised premises for an illegal purpose? That was the issue in Assethold Ltd v Interface Properties Ltd [2024] UKUT 371 (LC).
We are delighted to announce that we have been shortlisted for 3
